Unveiling Biases: Examining the Perpetuation of Limited Perspectives in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

 

As a missionary when talking about possible other sources of information other than directly from The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints they would say "Would you go to burger king to ask about McDonalds? Than why would you go somewhere else to ask about the church?" I've been thinking about the potential biases this thinking can perpetuate.  

This statement reflects a common response from believers within the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church) when confronted with information from outside sources. While it may seem persuasive on the surface, it is essential to recognize the potential biases and limitations in this line of thinking. Here are some potential biases this thinking can perpetuate:

Confirmation bias: By dismissing sources that may be critical of the church reinforces confirmation bias, which is the tendency to seek and favor information that confirms preexisting beliefs. It discourages critical examination of alternative perspectives, limiting the scope of inquiry and potentially preventing individuals from engaging with diverse viewpoints.

Binary thinking: This line of thinking creates a false dichotomy between the church's perspective and any critical sources. It implies that the only valid sources of information about the church are those provided by the church itself. This binary thinking discourages individuals from exploring a wide range of viewpoints and limits their ability to make well-rounded, informed assessments.

Ad hominem attacks: The statement employs an ad hominem fallacy by categorizing critical sources as "anti-Mormon." It suggests that these sources are inherently biased and untrustworthy solely based on their opposition to the church. This approach disregards the content, evidence, and arguments presented in those sources, preventing individuals from engaging with the information on its own merits.

Information control: This line of thinking perpetuates a mindset of information control, where access to alternative perspectives is discouraged or dismissed. It implies that the church's sanctioned sources are the only reliable and valid sources of information. By discouraging individuals from exploring diverse viewpoints, it limits their ability to critically analyze information and make well-informed decisions.

Intellectual insulation: This thinking can lead to intellectual insulation or echo-chamber effects, where individuals primarily engage with information that reinforces their existing beliefs. It can create an environment where critical thinking and open dialogue are stifled, hindering personal growth and understanding.

Discouraging independent investigation: By suggesting that individuals should only rely on church-approved sources, this thinking discourages independent investigation and exploration. It may dissuade individuals from seeking a more comprehensive understanding of the church's history, practices, or alternative perspectives.

It's important to recognize that engaging with diverse perspectives, including critical ones, can provide a more comprehensive and balanced understanding of any subject. Being aware of these potential biases can help you approach information with a critical and open mind, enabling you to make informed decisions based on a broader range of viewpoints and evidence.